Who We Are
Welcome to ArticleXI.com!
We are a group of environmental advocates united in providing a one-stop source for Virginia's environmental news. We each focus on different issues, but share the vision of a Commonwealth that preserves and protects its natural resources. Please join us!

Why "Article XI"?

Click here to learn how you can participate!


Green Links
Virginia
Appalachian Voices
Chesapeake Bay Foundation
Chesapeake Climate Action Network
Coalition for Smarter Growth
Environment Virginia
Garden Club of Virginia
I Love Mountains
Nature Conservancy - Virginia
Piedmont Environmental Council
Scenic Virginia
Sierra Club, Virginia Chapter
Southern Appalachian Mountain Stewards
Southern Environmental Law Center
Virginia Conservation Network
Virginia Council of Trout Unlimited
Virginia League of Conservation Voters
Virginia Sustainable Building Network
Williamsburg Climate Action Network
Wise Energy Coalition

National
Audubon Naturalist Society
1Sky
Defenders of Wildlife
Green for All
National Wildlife Foundation
Natural Resources Defense Council
Sierra Club
We Campaign

Search




Advanced Search

Green Blogroll
Bay Daily
Build Baby Build
Chesapeake Climate Action Blog
Compass
The Energy Blog
Front Porch Blog
The Green Miles
Gristmill
Hampton Roads Sierra Club Blog
Southside Virginia Against Uranium Mining
Taking the Initiative - Carl Pope
Treehugger
Wise Energy Blog











Best Green Blogs



It's Getting Hot In Here

↑ Grab this Headline Animator



Article XI

Virginia: A Quick Once Over vs. Florida: State Sponsored Review

by: Eileen

Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 08:12:30 AM EST


Dr. James V. Koch, former president of ODU, has yet again backed away from his 2005 "report" on revenues resulting from Virginia's offshore drilling.  "I surely wouldn't want to go to the cross over the quick once over that I gave to this important topic", he wrote in a recent email to me.  

First, this really doesn't qualify as a report.  Indeed, I don't even have a copy.  I was given about 48 hours to produce a very quick estimate of the economic benefits (jobs, income, taxes) that might be generated by drilling off shore.  Since I had no Virginia data, and no time to produce any, I looked at what had happened previously in Louisiana and a Canadian province as a guide.  I did not have time to take environmental costs, etc., into account.  I do not list this work on my C.V. because I did not invest the considerable time and attention that I give to the many economic impact studies that I do.  

There's not much more to say.  Those who pose my weekend of work as a full-blown study are making way too much of it.   This was not the thorough study that needs to be done and I think should be done.  By the same token, the numbers that I produced aren't fictional; they are based upon what has happened other places in roughly similar circumstances.

Nonetheless, that report is the exclusive basis for McDonnell's legislative agenda whereby offshore drilling revenues fund our transportation fixes.  

Meanwhile the State of Florida has the novel idea of commissioning a state sponsored report as part of a state Senate review of whether a ban on offshore drilling should be lifted.

As reported in the Miami Herald, the report concludes that "[e]stimated reserves in Florida waters would provide the United States with less than a week's worth of oil and have no discernible effect on prices at the pump or U.S. reliance on foreign oil."  

The report is the latest indication that the push to open Florida waters as near as three miles from the state's beaches may be waning, at least for this year.

Another is that all 12 lobbyists for Florida Energy Associates, a group of independent petroleum explorers known as "wildcatters," that's been pushing for lifting the ban have withdrawn, according to the Legislature's lobbyist registry.

According to DOI, Virginia too has less than a week's worth of oil off its shores - 6.5 days to be exact. But that's not the truth that Bob McDonnell and his merry band of Flat Earth Society members want to run with.  They'll continue to run with a "report" that the author himself doesn't want to claim.  

And who are we kidding?!?  Could you ever imagine Virginia's legislature actually ordering a report to support their policy decisions?!?  

Eileen :: Virginia: A Quick Once Over vs. Florida: State Sponsored Review
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
asdasd (0.00 / 0)

Get the cheapest Juicy Couture discounts around. Find it all here: JC handbags, shoes, tracksuits, clothing, and more!
Juicy Couture
Juicy Hoodies
Juicy Jewelry

User comments or postings reflect the opinions of the responsible contributor only, and do not reflect the viewpoint of the Sierra Club and/or the League of Conservation Voters. The Sierra Club and the League of Conservation Voters do not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of any posting. The Sierra Club and the League of Conservation Voters accepts no obligation to review every posting, but reserves the right (but not the obligation) to delete postings that may be considered offensive, illegal or inappropriate. ArticleXI.com is paid for and authorized by
Virginia League of Conservation Voters PAC, 530 East Main Street, Ste. 410, Richmond, Virginia 23219, (804) 225-1902 and
Sierra Club VA PAC, 422 E. Franklin Street, Suite 302, Richmond, VA 23219, (804) 225-9113.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



Virginia Action Alerts
This space is currently under development. Check back soon!

Subscribe
Article XI Feed

Follow us on Twitter

Resources
Final Report: Governor's Commission on Climate Change

Governor's Renew Virginia

2007 Virginia Energy Plan

Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium

Chesapeake Bay Commission

Government Agencies
VA Department of Environmental Quality

VA Department of Conservation & Recreation

VA Department of Game & Inland Fisheries

Marine Resources Commission

Secretary of Natural Resources



Powered by: SoapBlox