Who We Are
Welcome to ArticleXI.com!
We are a group of environmental advocates united in providing a one-stop source for Virginia's environmental news. We each focus on different issues, but share the vision of a Commonwealth that preserves and protects its natural resources. Please join us!

Why "Article XI"?

Click here to learn how you can participate!


Green Links
Virginia
Appalachian Voices
Chesapeake Bay Foundation
Chesapeake Climate Action Network
Coalition for Smarter Growth
Environment Virginia
Garden Club of Virginia
I Love Mountains
Nature Conservancy - Virginia
Piedmont Environmental Council
Scenic Virginia
Sierra Club, Virginia Chapter
Southern Appalachian Mountain Stewards
Southern Environmental Law Center
Virginia Conservation Network
Virginia Council of Trout Unlimited
Virginia League of Conservation Voters
Virginia Sustainable Building Network
Williamsburg Climate Action Network
Wise Energy Coalition

National
Audubon Naturalist Society
1Sky
Defenders of Wildlife
Green for All
National Wildlife Foundation
Natural Resources Defense Council
Sierra Club
We Campaign

Search




Advanced Search

Green Blogroll
Bay Daily
Build Baby Build
Chesapeake Climate Action Blog
Compass
The Energy Blog
Front Porch Blog
The Green Miles
Gristmill
Hampton Roads Sierra Club Blog
Southside Virginia Against Uranium Mining
Taking the Initiative - Carl Pope
Treehugger
Wise Energy Blog











Best Green Blogs



It's Getting Hot In Here

↑ Grab this Headline Animator



Article XI
Surry

EPA to regulate CO2, or How coal plants die

by: Susanna

Thu Feb 19, 2009 at 16:22:44 PM EST

From the CCAN Blog

In the death throes of the Bush administration, then-EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson put the agency on record stating that CO2 is not a pollutant that should be regulated by the Clean Air Act.  This week, the current EPA administrator Lisa Jackson announced her intent to overturn that memorandum, putting the EPA on the path toward regulating carbon dioxide as a pollutant under the Clean Air Act.  

As a result of this decision, coal plants are dropping like flies.  The latest victim comes out of Oklahoma.  Opposition groups cite the EPA decision and public outcry, but the reps from the company building the plant say it's "purely a business decision."  With more and more planned coal plants biting the dust due to "business decisions," how much longer can coal companies insist that building new coal plants our best option?

But this hilarious video from 2006 reminds us that the fossil fuel industry isn't confined to the truth when defending its turf.  (No, it's not a spoof. It's real.)

There's More... :: (6 Comments, 306 words in story)

There is a Better Way - No to New Surry Coal Plant

by: glenbesa

Mon Feb 09, 2009 at 00:17:16 AM EST

Recently, Old Dominion Electric Cooperative announced plans to build a new coal-fired power plant in Surry County. This business-as-usual approach to generating electricity may have appeared to make sense in the 20th century, but in light of what we know today about the impacts of burning coal, Virginia can do much better.

The Wise Energy for Virginia Coalition has compared the consequences of generating electricity from coal to the alternatives, and must oppose construction of the new plant.

As utilities strive to keep electricity prices low, they have done everything they can to avoid or "externalize" the actual costs of generating electricity from coal. As a result, the real cost of that electricity - the true cost of coal - is far more than what is reflected on the monthly bill.

Since the 1970s and the passage of the federal Clean Air Act, utilities have spent millions of their customers' dollars lobbying and litigating against laws that would require them to clean up our air. The consequences of this lobbying and litigation are profound. Asthma rates have exploded as we breathe air contaminated with smog and soot, pollution that shortens all our lives. Many of our local fish come with a consumption warning about mercury contamination. Acid rain from the sulfur dioxide and nitrogen coming out of these coal-burning power plants acidifies streams and harms the great forests of the Appalachians. Even the expanding dead zone in the Chesapeake Bay is partially the result of burning coal, which contributes 25 percent or more of the nitrogen that chokes our Bay.

The damage doesn't stop there. Today more and more coal is mined by a method called mountaintop removal mining. Let that sink in: mountaintop removal mining. The companies that provide the coal burned in power plants routinely blow up entire mountains to get at the coal seams and then simply dump the rock and dirt in the nearest stream valley. This practice displaces communities that live in the coal fields, all in the name of cheap electricity.

Overshadowing all this harm associated with burning coal is the looming threat of global climate change. Hampton Roads is particularly vulnerable to the sea level rise that is anticipated to swallow wetlands and waterfront homes and businesses the next 50 to 100 years.

There is a better way.  By simply using our electricity more efficiently, we can use considerably less energy to provide the same convenience and do the same work.  A study by the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, released last September, found that in Virginia we could meet close to 30 percent of our electricity needs by 2025 through energy efficiency. Changing our light bulbs to compact fluorescents or even newer LEDs is one example of efficiency, but there is a wide range of existing technologies and techniques to reduce demand at a cost far less than that of building a new power plant. And the good news is these investments in efficiency save money and create far more jobs than building and operating a new coal plant. ACEEE estimates that an even more modest approach to efficiency would save electricity consumers $15 billion through 2025 and create nearly 10,000 new jobs.

These investments give us the time we need to deploy renewable energy technologies such as wind and solar. An analysis by the Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium has found that there is a potential for 4 gigawatts of electricity just 12 miles off the coast of Virginia Beach. Investing in offshore wind would bring thousands of new jobs to our region in building and maintaining these wind farms.

There are real alternatives to burning coal to generate electricity. The Wise Energy Coalition stands ready to work with the ODEC to pursue these alternatives.

(This OpEd was published in the Sunday VA Pilot 2/8/09)

Discuss :: (3 Comments)
<< Previous
User comments or postings reflect the opinions of the responsible contributor only, and do not reflect the viewpoint of the Sierra Club and/or the League of Conservation Voters. The Sierra Club and the League of Conservation Voters do not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of any posting. The Sierra Club and the League of Conservation Voters accepts no obligation to review every posting, but reserves the right (but not the obligation) to delete postings that may be considered offensive, illegal or inappropriate. ArticleXI.com is paid for and authorized by
Virginia League of Conservation Voters PAC, 530 East Main Street, Ste. 410, Richmond, Virginia 23219, (804) 225-1902 and
Sierra Club VA PAC, 422 E. Franklin Street, Suite 302, Richmond, VA 23219, (804) 225-9113.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Subscribe
Article XI Feed

Follow us on Twitter

Resources
Final Report: Governor's Commission on Climate Change

Governor's Renew Virginia

2007 Virginia Energy Plan

Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium

Chesapeake Bay Commission

Government Agencies
VA Department of Environmental Quality

VA Department of Conservation & Recreation

VA Department of Game & Inland Fisheries

Marine Resources Commission

Secretary of Natural Resources



Powered by: SoapBlox